Skip to main content

Mesothelioma Lawsuit Death


Mesothelioma Lawsuit Death


The Court of Appeals of California recently resolved a contentious mesothelioma lawsuit in which an asbestos company attempted to deny the children of a deceased man the right to pursue wrongful death claims. The case pitted Elementis Chemicals, Inc. against the adult children of Marty Marteney, who died of mesothelioma in January of 2015.

The Marteney’s mesothelioma lawsuit was similar to many others: Marty and his wife Marie filed a claim against Elements, Union Carbide Corporation (UCC), and many other defendants, accusing them of having been involved in the manufacture and marketing of asbestos-containing products that caused his illness. The couple settled with several of the defendants, leaving only Union Carbide and Elementis to litigate their claim, and at trial a jury apportioned a percentage of responsibility to those companies. As per the terms of the settlement with the others (which included language pertaining to wrongful death claims), it was determined what UCC and Elementis owed for both economic damages and noneconomic damages. Elements appealed the ruling, and while the appeal was pending, Marty died. His adult children then filed a wrongful death claim while Marie settled her lawsuit voluntarily. Elementis then appealed,  arguing that the adult children were compelled to abide by the terms of the settlements that existed between the companies, Marty, and Marie, as well as on other factors.

Upon review of the case, the court sided with the adult children, focusing on Elementis’ argument that when Marie and Marty had negotiated the terms of their own mesothelioma lawsuit, they were acting as agents for their children: the asbestos company said, “Respondents are of course free to let their mother keep that money, but it belongs to them and Elementis is entitled to the settlement credit.” The court disagreed with the notion that the children could or should recover the funds from their mother, or that the parents having given them cash gifts prior to and after Marty’s death somehow negated their right to file their own lawsuit.

Mesothelioma victims and their families struggle with many unfair elements, and it is always rewarding when the courts are able to treat them thoughtfully and with compassion. If you need information on how to approach any aspect of life with mesothelioma, we are here to help. Call the Patient Advocates at budak-adsense.blogspot.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mesothelioma Lawsuit After Death - America’s Toxic Legacy

America’s toxic legacy may leave behind a half-million deaths WASHINGTON, D.C. — The first sign of trouble came as Bill Rogers was mowing his lawn one morning in January 2007. “As I would go back and forth with the mower, I would run out of air,” says Rogers, 67, of Palm Bay, Fla. Rogers went to the doctor and learned that his right lung was full of fluid. Three days later he was diagnosed with mesothelioma , a lethal tumor that occurs in the lining of the chest or the abdomen and is almost always associated with asbestos exposure. “I’d heard of it, but I didn’t really know what it was,” he says. “They told me it’s not a good cancer to get.” That Rogers is alive more than three years after his diagnosis is something of a miracle. To him, the source of his illness is clear: He worked on or around asbestos -containing automobile brakes, mostly at General Motors dealerships, for 44 years. He and his co-workers had used compressed-air hoses to clean out brake drums, where debri

Mesothelioma Lawsuit After Death - Asbestos Exposure

Mesothelioma Lawsuit After Death - Asbestos Exposure Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive form of cancer affecting the tissue lining the lungs, stomach, heart and other vital organs caused by prolonged exposure to asbestos. Between 3800 and 4000 new cases are diagnosed in the United States each year. Life expectancy for the most common form of the disease is only 4-24 months following the onset of symptoms. Although the link between asbestos and disease has been investigated since the early 20th century, it wasn’t until 1989 that the EPA issued an Asbestos Ban and Phase Out Rule (only to see it overturned two years later.) As recently as 2008, asbestos has been found in Polk County, when the Polk County Sheriff’s Department uncovered illegal dumping of the material in Winter Haven. In St. Petersburg, a real estate developer was indicted for the illegal handling of thousands of square feet of asbestos in 2010. While the EPA has established exposure limits for asbestos,